Bloomberg reports that Apple
and Qualcomm made attempts to invest in Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) - the world's largest custom maker of chips.
The report claims that both proposals
included investments of more than $1 billion in cash to get exclusive
access to the chips supplies from TSMC.
Bloomberg reports:
The two
companies are trying to satisfy booming demand for smartphones, a market
estimated by to be worth
$219.1 billion, according to data compiled by
Bloomberg Industries. Any deal would give Apple an alternate supplier to
Samsung Electronics Co. (005930), which builds the main chip used in
the iPhone and iPad and is also its biggest rival in smartphones.
Qualcomm needs to boost supply, since shortages are starting to limit
earnings.
TSMC however rejected the offers as it wanted to keep the flexibility of working with multiple customers.
While TSMC is
Qualcomm’s biggest supplier, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, it
has been successful because it has worked with multiple customers.
Dedicating one facility to a single product or customer creates the risk
of a fabrication plant becoming a burden if the product, client or
technology changes, said Ho.
“You have to be
careful. Once that product migrates, what are going to do with that
dedicated fab?” said Ho. “We would like to keep the flexibility.”
Last year, several rumors indicated that TSMC will provide the chips for future iOS devices,
however production issues forced Apple to continue to source the chips
from Samsung. It makes sense for Apple to look for alternative suppliers
for the chips to reduce its dependance on Samsung, which is the sole
supplier.
While Samsung is taking steps to create
an "internal firewall" between its handset business and its components
business to ensure that the $1 billion verdict does not have an adverse
impact on component contracts from Apple, we've also heard that Samsung
is also taking steps to diversify its customer base by adding new
customers like Qualcomm to reduce its reliance on Apple.
[via Bloomberg]
No comments:
Post a Comment